What Are Experimental Designs? A Guide for Behavior Analysts

In the world of Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), our goal is to design effective interventions that lead to meaningful behavior change. But how do we know that our interventions are really making a difference? How can we be sure that the behavior changes we see are actually the result of our treatment and not something else? That’s where experimental designs come in.

Experimental designs are the backbone of behavioral research and practice. They help us establish clear cause-and-effect relationships, providing the evidence we need to confidently say that our interventions are working. In this post, we’ll explore what experimental designs are, why they matter, and take a closer look at the most common designs used in ABA.

What Is an Experimental Design?

In simple terms, an experimental design is a structured way to test whether an independent variable (e.g., an intervention) has a specific effect on a dependent variable (e.g., behavior). By carefully controlling and measuring variables, we can isolate the effects of the intervention and make valid conclusions about its effectiveness.

In behavior analysis, experimental designs are crucial because they help us answer key questions like:

  • Did the intervention cause the behavior change?
  • Would the behavior have changed without the intervention?
  • Can we replicate these results in different settings or with different individuals?

These designs allow us to confidently apply evidence-based practices and ensure that our interventions are both effective and ethical.

The Key Elements of Experimental Designs

Before we dive into specific types of experimental designs, let’s quickly cover some of the essential components:

  • Independent Variable (IV): This is what you’re manipulating or changing in the experiment. In ABA, this is usually the intervention or treatment you’re implementing.
  • Dependent Variable (DV): This is the behavior or outcome you’re measuring to see if it changes in response to the independent variable.
  • Baseline: In many designs, a baseline phase is used to measure the behavior before any intervention is applied. This helps establish what the behavior looks like under “normal” conditions.
  • Control: To demonstrate that the intervention caused the behavior change, you need to rule out alternative explanations (e.g., environmental changes, chance). This is done by carefully controlling other variables.

Common Experimental Designs in ABA

Behavior analysts rely on a variety of experimental designs to test interventions. Each has its own strengths and is suited to different kinds of behaviors and settings. Let’s take a closer look at the most common experimental designs used in ABA practice.

1. Single-Subject Designs

Single-subject designs are the most commonly used experimental designs in ABA. As the name suggests, these designs focus on the individual rather than a group, making them perfect for evaluating behavior change on a case-by-case basis.

Some common single-subject designs include:

A-B-A-B Design (Reversal Design)
In an A-B-A-B design, you alternate between A (baseline) and B (intervention) phases. By repeatedly introducing and withdrawing the intervention, you can demonstrate a cause-and-effect relationship. If the behavior changes only during the B phases (when the intervention is in place) and returns to baseline levels during A phases (when the intervention is removed), it provides strong evidence that the intervention is effective.

This design is often used when you can safely withdraw the intervention without harm to the client.

Multiple Baseline Design
In a multiple baseline design, the intervention is introduced at different times across multiple settings, behaviors, or individuals. This staggered approach helps rule out alternative explanations, since changes in behavior only occur after the intervention is introduced.

For example, if you’re testing an intervention to reduce aggressive behavior in three different individuals, you might introduce the intervention for the first individual after a week of baseline, for the second individual after two weeks, and for the third after three weeks. If behavior change only occurs after the intervention is introduced for each person, it supports the idea that the intervention caused the change.

Changing Criterion Design
In this design, behavior is gradually shaped by changing the performance criterion over time. For example, if you’re trying to increase the number of math problems a student completes, you might start with a criterion of 5 problems, then increase it to 10, and eventually to 15. Each time the student meets the criterion, it’s raised slightly.

This design is particularly useful when your goal is to gradually improve or decrease a specific behavior and allows for ongoing progress monitoring.

2. Group Designs

While ABA primarily uses single-subject designs, group designs are also common in broader behavioral research. These designs compare the performance of a treatment group to a control group.

Randomized Control Trials (RCTs)
In an RCT, participants are randomly assigned to either a treatment group (receiving the intervention) or a control group (no intervention or a different intervention). After the intervention, both groups’ behaviors are compared to see if the treatment group shows significant improvement compared to the control group.

RCTs are considered the gold standard in research for establishing cause-and-effect relationships, but they’re less common in ABA practice due to their logistical challenges and focus on groups rather than individuals.

3. Alternating Treatments Design

In an alternating treatments design, two or more interventions are alternated in rapid succession to see which one has a greater effect on behavior. This design is particularly useful when you want to compare the effectiveness of different treatments in a short amount of time.

For example, if you’re trying to figure out whether a token economy or a differential reinforcement system works better for reducing tantrums, you can alternate between the two interventions on different days and compare the outcomes.

Why Experimental Designs Matter in ABA

Experimental designs allow behavior analysts to scientifically validate their interventions, ensuring that they are both effective and ethical. Without these designs, we would be left guessing whether the interventions we implement are truly responsible for the behavior changes we observe.

Additionally, these designs help protect clients by ensuring that only proven, evidence-based interventions are used. They also provide a clear method for replicating successful interventions in different settings, with different behaviors, or across multiple individuals.

Final Thoughts: Choosing the Right Experimental Design

Choosing the right experimental design depends on the nature of the behavior you’re targeting, the client’s needs, and the specific goals of your intervention. By understanding and applying these designs, you can make data-driven decisions that lead to effective and lasting behavior change.

Remember, the goal is to establish clear, evidence-based links between your interventions and the desired behavior outcomes. With the right experimental design, you’ll have the tools to do just that—building stronger interventions, improving client outcomes, and advancing the field of behavior analysis.

Like this article?

Scroll to Top