Exploring Behavior Reduction Techniques: From Reprimands to Response Cost

Behavior reduction strategies are crucial in Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) to address challenging behaviors in a way that is ethical and effective. From verbal reprimands to more complex procedures like response cost, there are numerous strategies available, each with a specific purpose depending on the situation.

Here’s a breakdown of some key behavior reduction techniques that can be applied to help manage and modify undesirable behaviors.

1. Reprimands

A reprimand involves giving a verbal instruction to stop a behavior. While reprimands are commonly used, their effectiveness as a punishment procedure has limited empirical backing. However, the tone and delivery of the reprimand can significantly influence its success. A firm, yet calm delivery, tends to be more effective than emotional or harsh reprimands.

2. Response Block

Response blocking is a physical intervention that occurs immediately when an individual begins to engage in a problem behavior. This method has proven effective for behaviors like hand mouthing, pica, and eye poking. The key here is to use the least amount of physical constraint necessary to stop the behavior without causing distress.

3. Response Interruption and Redirection (RIRD)

RIRD involves interrupting a repetitive or stereotypical behavior and guiding the learner towards a more appropriate, high-probability behavior. This strategy is especially useful for redirecting self-stimulatory behaviors (also known as “stimming”) to more functional alternatives.

4. Contingent Exercise

With contingent exercise, the learner is asked to perform a task that is unrelated to the problem behavior. For example, if a learner displays aggression, they might be instructed to stand up and sit down multiple times. This procedure serves as a punishment by introducing effortful but unrelated actions in response to problem behaviors.

5. Overcorrection

Overcorrection requires the learner to perform a behavior that is related to the problem behavior but demands more effort. Overcorrection can be effective not only in addressing the problem behavior but also in promoting positive behaviors that are the opposite of the undesirable one.

Types of Overcorrection:

  • Restitution Overcorrection: The learner must restore the environment to its original condition and improve it further. For example, if crayons are spilled, the learner is asked to clean up the crayons and tidy the area even more.
  • Positive Practice Overcorrection: The learner is required to repeatedly practice the correct behavior. If someone tracks mud into the house, for instance, they may be directed to repeatedly wipe their feet properly.

6. Time Out from Reinforcement

Time out from reinforcement is a negative punishment procedure where access to reinforcement (like attention, privileges, or activities) is temporarily removed. There are two main types of time-outs:

  • Non-Exclusion Time-Out: The learner stays in the environment but is deprived of reinforcement. For example, they might be moved to a spot where they can see activities going on but are not allowed to participate.
  • Planned Ignoring: This involves withholding attention when a learner’s behavior is seeking attention. For example, if a child is throwing a tantrum for attention, the adult intentionally ignores the behavior to avoid reinforcing it.
  • Exclusion Time-Out: The learner is removed from the environment entirely. This method involves taking the individual away from the reinforcing setting.

7. Response Cost

Response cost is another negative punishment strategy where the learner loses access to a positive reinforcer as a consequence of undesirable behavior. This is often used in token systems, where tokens earned for positive behaviors are removed when a problem behavior occurs. Think of it as a “fine” for engaging in the behavior.


Conclusion

Each of these behavior reduction strategies has its place in an ABA toolkit. Choosing the right one depends on the specific needs of the learner and the nature of the behavior being addressed. When applied carefully and ethically, these techniques can effectively reduce challenging behaviors and promote positive, adaptive alternatives.

Like this article?

Scroll to Top