Understanding Reversal Designs

In Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), reversal designs play a crucial role in evaluating the effectiveness of interventions. These designs involve repeatedly introducing and withdrawing the independent variable (IV) to observe its impact on behavior. By alternating between baseline and intervention phases, researchers can identify whether the treatment is directly responsible for the changes in behavior. In this blog post, we’ll explore different types of reversal designs, their advantages, and their limitations.


What Are Reversal Designs?

Reversal designs involve measuring behavior across consecutive phases: Baseline (A), Intervention (B), and a return to Baseline (A)—often referred to as an ABA design. This structure allows researchers to predict, verify, and replicate the effects of an intervention.

  • Baseline (A): The phase where no treatment is applied, allowing researchers to measure the natural occurrence of the behavior.
  • Intervention (B): The phase where the treatment is introduced to observe its effect on the target behavior.
  • Return to Baseline (A): The treatment is withdrawn to see if the behavior reverts to baseline levels, confirming the effect of the intervention.

Example:

In an ABA design, a researcher might observe a child’s aggressive behavior during baseline (A), introduce an intervention like positive reinforcement (B), and then withdraw the intervention to see if the aggressive behavior returns to baseline levels (A). If the behavior decreases with the intervention and returns once it’s removed, the intervention is shown to have an effect.


Types of Reversal Designs

  1. Repeated Reversals (ABABABA):
    • Extending the reversal conditions with successive phases (e.g., ABABABA) strengthens the evidence for a functional relationship. Each additional presentation and withdrawal of the intervention further verifies its impact on the behavior.
  2. BAB Design:
    • In this variation, the design begins with the application of the intervention (B), then shifts to baseline (A), and returns to intervention (B). This design is useful in situations where the behavior is dangerous, or when treatment is already in place. However, it may be less effective in establishing an initial baseline rate of responding.
  3. Multiple Treatment Reversal Design (ABCABC):
    • This design compares the effects of multiple treatments, where additional letters (C, D, etc.) indicate different treatments being introduced. For example, if two treatments (B and C) are being tested, the phases might look like ABCABCABC. This design allows researchers to compare the effectiveness of multiple interventions.
  4. Non-Contingent Reinforcement (NCR) Reversal Design:
    • This design compares non-contingent reinforcement (NCR) with contingent reinforcement. In NCR, reinforcement is provided independently of the behavior, while in contingent reinforcement, reinforcement depends on the occurrence of the target behavior. This comparison helps determine the functional relationship between reinforcement and behavior.
  5. DRA/DRI Reversal Design:
    • In this variation, differential reinforcement of alternative (DRA) or incompatible behavior (DRI) is used as a control condition. This design helps demonstrate the effectiveness of using reinforcement to promote alternative or incompatible behaviors instead of the target behavior.
  6. DRO Reversal Design:
    • This design uses differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO) as a control condition. Here, reinforcement is provided when the target behavior does not occur. It helps demonstrate the effectiveness of reinforcement in reducing the occurrence of the undesired behavior.

Advantages of Reversal Design

  1. Clear Demonstration of Functional Relations:
    • Reversal designs offer a direct and clear depiction of the relationship between the intervention and behavior change. By alternating between phases, researchers can clearly identify whether the treatment is responsible for the observed changes in behavior.
  2. Quantification of Behavior Change:
    • These designs allow for the quantification of behavior change, making it easy to measure the magnitude of the treatment’s effect. This is valuable for both research and practical applications in therapy or educational settings.

Disadvantages of Reversal Design

  1. Irreversibility:
    • Not all behaviors or interventions are suited to reversal designs. Some behaviors may be irreversible, meaning that once a change occurs, it cannot easily be undone. For example, skills learned through teaching interventions may not disappear when the intervention is withdrawn, limiting the effectiveness of a reversal design.
  2. Social, Educational, and Ethical Concerns:
    • Repeatedly implementing and withdrawing an intervention may not always be practical or ethical, especially in cases where removing a treatment could harm the participant. For example, it may not be appropriate to withdraw a life-saving intervention just to demonstrate its effect.

Conclusion

Reversal designs are a powerful tool for demonstrating the effectiveness of interventions in ABA by directly showing the relationship between the intervention and behavior change. However, they come with limitations, particularly in situations where reversing the behavior may be difficult or unethical. Whether you’re considering an ABAB design or exploring more complex variations like multiple treatment or NCR reversal designs, these tools offer valuable insights into the functional relationship between interventions and behavior.

Do you have experience with reversal designs? Let us know how you’ve used them in your research or practice in the comments below.

Like this article?

Scroll to Top