A Comprehensive Guide to Preference Assessments in ABA

Preference assessments are essential tools in ABA (Applied Behavior Analysis) that help identify and rank stimuli that may act as reinforcers for specific behaviors. By understanding which stimuli motivate a person, therapists can develop individualized treatment plans that maximize the effectiveness of reinforcement-based interventions. Preference assessments are not a one-time event; they should be conducted periodically throughout therapy to ensure the most effective reinforcers are used.

There are several types of preference assessments, and the choice of method depends on the individual’s abilities and the behaviors being targeted. Let’s dive into the different types of preference assessments and how they can guide therapeutic decision-making.


Natural Free Operant Preference Assessment

In a natural free operant preference assessment, the therapist observes the client in their typical environment, such as their home or school, without interfering. The therapist simply records the items or activities that the client chooses to interact with spontaneously.

The data collected includes the frequency and duration of interactions with different items or activities. By ranking these preferences, the therapist can identify potential reinforcers that align with the client’s natural inclinations.

Advantages:

  • Provides insight into natural preferences in real-world settings.
  • Works well for clients with more advanced communication skills.
  • Useful when structured assessments might not yield accurate results.

Contrived Free Operant Preference Assessment

In a contrived free operant assessment, the therapist creates a structured environment by presenting the client with a variety of items or activities to choose from. The client is allowed to explore the items freely for a set period (typically 1-3 minutes), and their interactions are recorded.

Like the natural assessment, the therapist tracks the frequency and duration of interactions to determine the client’s preferences. This method can be helpful for clients who may need a more structured environment to reveal preferences.

Advantages:

  • Identifies preferences for items or activities that may not be part of the client’s natural environment.
  • Particularly useful for clients with limited communication skills or developmental delays.

Single-Item Preference Assessment

In a single-item preference assessment, the therapist presents items one at a time to the client. The therapist records the client’s response to each item, which can fall into one of three categories:

  1. Interaction or consumption of the item.
  2. No response.
  3. Avoidance of the item.

For food items, the therapist gives the client a small piece to consume, while for non-food items, the client gets 30 seconds to interact with the object. After the session, the therapist ranks the items based on how frequently the client interacted with them.

Advantages:

  • Simple to implement.
  • Allows the therapist to test many items and tailor reinforcement strategies accordingly.

Paired-Choice Preference Assessment (Forced Choice)

In a paired-choice preference assessment, the therapist presents two items at a time, forcing the client to choose one. The chosen item is then available for interaction for 30 seconds. This process is repeated with different pairs, presented in random order to avoid bias.

By using paired comparisons, the therapist can more easily identify which items are truly preferred, especially when the client seems interested in most items during single-item assessments. The therapist records the frequency of selections for each item to rank preferences.

Advantages:

  • Provides a clear ranking of preferred items.
  • Useful for clients who respond to most stimuli in single-item assessments.

Multiple-Stimulus Without Replacement (MSWO)

In a multiple-stimulus without replacement (MSWO) preference assessment, the client is presented with several items at once. After selecting an item, the client is allowed to interact with it for 30 seconds, after which the item is removed from the array and not replaced. This continues until all items are chosen or rejected.

MSWO is particularly useful for determining strong preferences because the removal of each selected item forces the client to make more distinct choices between the remaining items.

Advantages:

  • Helps identify a hierarchy of preferences in a short amount of time.
  • Useful for clients who can scan an array of items and make independent choices.

Multiple-Stimulus With Replacement (MSW)

In a multiple-stimulus with replacement (MSW) assessment, items are presented in an array, and the client is allowed to choose one. After interacting with the selected item, it is returned to the array, and the process repeats with the same items. The goal is to allow the client repeated opportunities to select their preferred items.

MSW helps reduce the possibility of the client repeatedly selecting the same item, as they are exposed to a variety of choices each time.

Advantages:

  • Allows for repeated trials to identify strong preferences.
  • Especially useful for clients who need repeated exposures to clarify preferences.

Conclusion

Preference assessments are vital tools in ABA that help therapists identify what motivates a client. Whether through observing natural interactions in a real-world setting or using structured assessments like MSWO or paired-choice, these assessments ensure that the most effective reinforcers are identified and used. Regularly conducting preference assessments allows therapists to keep interventions fresh, ensuring that treatment plans are always tailored to the client’s changing preferences and needs. By incorporating these assessments into therapy, therapists can create more effective, personalized interventions that promote meaningful behavior change.

Like this article?

Scroll to Top